Summary and Conclusions
Case Study illustrates several typical elements of expert systems
Basic problem historically solved (somehow) by experts
Data often missing or inconsistent
Cooperative local experts and/or past results aid development
Results
Clarification of departmental placements
Much clearer view of boundaries:
Pre-calculus/Calculus I
Calculus I/Calculus II
Advice clear and direct
Some previous placements had been "start in either Calculus I or Calculus II"
CS placements developed to complement math placements
Letters to students/advisors well-received
Letters identify data used to make placements
Letters provide course description and/or public relations
May be factor in increased math and CS enrollments
Joint student/faculty paper published by
Journal of Computer Science Education
Current system generally acknowledged to perform better than faculty (including the past "local experts")
created May 1, 2003
last revised May 1, 2003
previous
next