Test the first version of the insert
procedure by using it to insert a real number
What happens if ls is not in ascending order when
insert is invoked?
Modify the first version of the insert
procedure so that it inserts a string into a list of strings that are in
alphabetical order:
> (modified-insert "dog" (list "ape" "bear" "cat" "emu" "frog"))
("ape" "bear" "cat" "dog" "emu" "frog")
Test the first version
of the insertion-sort procedure on some potentially troublesome
arguments: an empty list, a list containing only one element, a list
containing all equal values, and a list in which the elements are
originally in descending numerical order.
Use the generalized insertion-sort procedure to sort the clean-sample-data list from the project on summarizing poll
responses by the respondents' ID
numbers.
(Hint: begin by writing an appropriate ordering predicate -- a procedure that takes two strings as arguments and determines whether the numeral in the first six positions of one string is less than or equal to the numeral in the first six positions of the other string.)
Create and name a vector containing the strings "bear", "emu", "frog", "ape", "dog", and "cat".
Rearrange the elements of the vector into alphabetical order by means of an
appropriate call to insertion-sort!. (Note that the sorting occurs
as a side effect of this call -- the value of the do-expression in
the body of insertion-sort! is unspecified -- so to confirm that the
sorting procedure worked you'll have to inspect the vector again
afterwards.)